Articles & News
March 12,
2008
Lawmakers to review jail
project
Community leaders oppose
proposals to build re-entry facility in their neighborhoods
By JIM JOHNSON, Herald
Salinas Bureau, Monterey Herald
Despite mounting concerns
about a new state prison inmate re-entry facility, county
supervisors will today consider going forward with plans to apply
for a state grant that would help pay for a $130 million, 445-bed
county jail expansion project.
According to Sheriff Mike Kanalakis, if the county can deliver a
site for the state re-entry facility, it would give it a leg up on
winning money for expansion of an aging and overcrowded county
jail.
Kanalakis is proposing the supervisors approve one of two sites
along Highway 101 near Soledad for the building as part of the
county's state grant funding application. The county would have to
acquire the land and offer it to the state as part of the deal.
The 500-bed "mini-prison" re-entry facility would be built for
state prison inmates already slated for release in Monterey County
within six months, and would provide mental health treatment and
vocational training to help them re-adjust to society.
If approved, the county would get up to $80 million from AB 900,
the Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act
approved last year, for the jail expansion. The county would have
to provide the remaining $50 million for the expansion at the
current Natividad Road site in Salinas.
"We need this," Kanalakis said.
But supervisors are worried about a number of issues related to
the re-entry facility, not the least of which is Soledad city
officials' reaction to Kanalakis' proposal.
Soledad Mayor Richard
Advertisement
Click here to find out more!
Ortiz said city officials feel like the county is trying to "dump"
the re-entry facility in their town without regard to the
potential impact.
Ortiz said the city is already having difficulties negotiating
with the nearby state prisons regarding sewer agreements, and
doesn't need any more such issues. He pointed out that the city of
Salinas had already rejected an earlier proposal to locate the
re-entry facility there.
"The city of Salinas said not in my backyard, and the city of
Soledad kind of feels the same way — not in my backyard," Ortiz
said. "We already have two prisons and to create more problems, we
don't need them. We really don't want to shoot the county in the
foot because we know they're overcrowded and need to expand their
jail. But we don't want to become a dumping ground."
Ortiz suggested the county look at alternative sites, such as the
Sheriff's posse grounds outside Salinas.
Supervisor Simon Salinas called the proposed Soledad sites
inappropriate and said he'd prefer the re-entry facility be
located closer to the prisons.
"My hope is we'll allow the grant to move forward without choosing
a site," Salinas said.
Supervisor Dave Potter agreed that no one should be forced to
accept the new facility.
"I'm not going to be supportive of forcing another community to
take on these issues of an expanding prison population and all the
problems that come with that," Potter said.
Kanalakis said the board should look at all its options and
consider public input, but that a site needs to be chosen before
the grant application is submitted. He said alternative sites such
as the Sheriff's posse grounds or near the state prisons are not
real options, though he said a site north of Soledad off San
Vicente Road could work. He also noted that time is an issue, and
pointed out that state officials will review grant proposals by
April 23, with awards set for May 8.
That also means there is no time for public hearings on the grant
proposal, Kanalakis said, and the county would be committed to
whatever plan the board chooses if and when the state approves the
funding.
Salinas and Potter also said they were concerned about a spate of
recent changes to AB 900, including the type of re-entry inmate
that would be allowed at the facility and the availability of
state funding for re-entry programs.
The actual county cost of the jail expansion would be about $165
million, including interest, debt service, a decade of Sheriff's
and behavioral health operations, and other expenses.
If the supervisors approve the grant application, they would
return on April 1 to consider how to fund the county contribution.
If the board decides the grant terms aren't acceptable, the
supervisors could choose to withdraw its proposal on April 18.
Jim Johnson can be reached at 753-6753 or jjohnson@montereyherald.com.
|